<?xml version="1.0" standalone="yes"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="css/rss.xslt"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><channel><title>WikiBlog-VPN协议</title><link>http://www.godupgod.com/post/111.html</link><generator>RainbowSoft Studio Z-Blog 1.8 Spirit Build 80722</generator><language>zh-CN</language><pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 01:09:26 +0800</pubDate><item><title>Re:VPN协议</title><author>lqymichael@hotmail.com (lee.michael)</author><link>http://www.godupgod.com/post/111.html#cmt112</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:13:25 +0800</pubDate><guid>http://www.godupgod.com/post/111.html#cmt112</guid><description><![CDATA[学习了...<br/>GRE用作设备级的VPN<br/>其他的用作单个用户远程VPN接入。<br/>我觉得还是PPTP实现起来更加简单快捷。貌似也可以采用ipsec加密。<br/>版主认为呢？<br/><blockquote><div class="quote quote3"><div class="quote-title">godupgod 于 2009-2-16 22:02:27 回复</div>是啊，单个用户可以用PPTP VPN或者IPSec VPN</div></blockquote>]]></description></item><item><title>Re:VPN协议</title><author> (xxx)</author><link>http://www.godupgod.com/post/111.html#cmt84</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 21:33:14 +0800</pubDate><guid>http://www.godupgod.com/post/111.html#cmt84</guid><description><![CDATA[不知道为什么gre反而浪费cpu？既没有加密，也没有解密<blockquote><div class="quote quote3"><div class="quote-title">godupgod 于 2008-11-4 13:22:15 回复</div>应该说是隧道消耗CPU高吧，（Tunneling is CPU intensive）</div></blockquote>]]></description></item></channel></rss>
